Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:33
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Are you able to lie, even though you have Aspergers?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How many books do you read in a week and what are they, could you share one?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
2025 NHL Draft Results and Team-by-Team Grades for Notable Picks - Bleacher Report
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Here’s a Tip to Companies: Beware of Promoting AI in Products - WSJ
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
June's full 'Strawberry Moon' illuminates the night sky next week: Here's how to see it - Space
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
13-inch Microsoft Surface Laptop review: A slightly worse version of a year-old PC - Ars Technica
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Amazon Draws Whole Foods Closer in Grocery Unit Reorganization - Bloomberg
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What World Does Bitcoin Want To Build For Itself? - Defector